<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All that really matters . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/</link>
	<description>Beingness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Gilberti, H.M.,M.</title>
		<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Gilberti, H.M.,M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 22:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengilberti.com/?p=575#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>Hi Sami.

That&#039;s a common question, with regard to anything, not just money.  The simple answer is that the vichara has nothing to do with any of that.  The vichara is simply noticing you being.  Period.  The side effect very well may be that you either will have no concern regarding money or that enough sufficient funds will show up to make that the case or any number of other scenarios that would represent a harmonious resolution of the issue.  But the vichara itself doesn&#039;t entail any of that.  Whic is good news because that means the enterprise of practicing the vichara remains always supremely simple.

Much Love, 

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sami.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a common question, with regard to anything, not just money.  The simple answer is that the vichara has nothing to do with any of that.  The vichara is simply noticing you being.  Period.  The side effect very well may be that you either will have no concern regarding money or that enough sufficient funds will show up to make that the case or any number of other scenarios that would represent a harmonious resolution of the issue.  But the vichara itself doesn&#8217;t entail any of that.  Whic is good news because that means the enterprise of practicing the vichara remains always supremely simple.</p>
<p>Much Love, </p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sami</title>
		<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengilberti.com/?p=575#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>As a newbie to Vichara, I find this posting helpful. The practice of returning back to my true being, feeling it and experimenting with how it feels sounds really worth a try. From the source viewpoint, it is senseless to get stuck into concerns of everyday life. They are not who I truly am, and perhaps I need to experiment more with this approach. When I return to the my true being, the problem really does not exist there.

One thing that I&#039;d like to have more clarity is how does Vichara work with if you&#039;d like to have some extra cash, for example? Is the right approach to once again return and realize the need is not real and just let it be? Or does it render Vichara less effective if you realize in the true being state that the thing is taken care of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a newbie to Vichara, I find this posting helpful. The practice of returning back to my true being, feeling it and experimenting with how it feels sounds really worth a try. From the source viewpoint, it is senseless to get stuck into concerns of everyday life. They are not who I truly am, and perhaps I need to experiment more with this approach. When I return to the my true being, the problem really does not exist there.</p>
<p>One thing that I&#8217;d like to have more clarity is how does Vichara work with if you&#8217;d like to have some extra cash, for example? Is the right approach to once again return and realize the need is not real and just let it be? Or does it render Vichara less effective if you realize in the true being state that the thing is taken care of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del Kocur</title>
		<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Del Kocur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengilberti.com/?p=575#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>Keep working ,great job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep working ,great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enriqueta Ragasa</title>
		<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Enriqueta Ragasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengilberti.com/?p=575#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>thanks !! very helpful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks !! very helpful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://bengilberti.com/2009/08/god-and-watermelon/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bengilberti.com/?p=575#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Thank you Ben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

